mordrin wrote:I still don't understand why people get pissy about that.We share all kinds of information about lists and printings and dates and authenticity, but stock photos turn some people rabidly territorial.
mordrin wrote:Well, that's a whole different topic - whether you as a buyer want to risk paying for something that's got a 'representative' photo with description, rather than a real photo.But I know some people go apeshit if someone 'steals' their photo, uses it in an auction, and very clearly states that the photo is representative and not the actual item.That I don't get.